The future of GST hangs in the balance
Context
- The Centre is best positioned to raise additional resources to bridge the GST compensation gap.
GST compensation
- Under GST law, states are guaranteed full compensation for any revenue loss for the first five years after the introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) in July 2017.
- The computation of the shortfall — the mechanism for which is spelt out in Section 7 of the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 — is done annually by projecting a revenue assumption based on 14% compounded growth from the base year’s (2015-2016) revenue and calculating the difference between that figure and the actual GST collections in that year.
- For the 2020-21 fiscal year, the revenue shortfall has been anticipated at ₹3 lakh crore, with the Compensation Fund expected to have only about ₹65,000 crore.
- GST was born in the cradle of this promise and hailed as a forerunner of ‘cooperative federalism’.
What is the issue?
- There is not enough money in the GST kitty for the Centre to honour this obligation.
What did the centre propose?
- The Centre has proposed that the States should borrow money to bridge this gap and that it will act as a guarantor to facilitate this borrowing.
Criticism of centre’s proposal
- State’s decision to borrow or not should be based on its fiscal situation.
- State governments don’t have the powers to levy direct taxes or indirect taxes to earn additional revenues.
- Economic logic suggests that the Centre is better positioned than the states to raise additional resources to bridge the GST compensation gap.
Options to raise additional resources
- Additional revenue can be created through increased taxation of capital market transactions. Between April and June, when economic activity in the nation had come to a complete standstill, India’s stock markets experienced its highest activity levels in its history, with a 75% increase in transactions vis-a-vis last year.
- Thus, the Centre can levy a higher tax on such speculative stock market trading to earn additional revenues during these difficult times.
- A combination of additional revenues and borrowing by the Centre can help resolve the GST compensation issue.
Conclusion
- GST Compensation is primarily an economic issue and should be settled based on what makes the most economic sense for each State and for the nation overall.
Reference:
Subscribe
Login
0 Comments